Angle-Closure From the Inside-Out
Jeffrey M. Liebmann, M.D.
Robert Ritch, M.D.
New imaging technologies are revolutionizing our understanding and
treatment of a wide variety of ocular disorders. Confocal scanning
laser ophthalmoscopy, ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM), confocal
scanning laser polarimetry, color Doppler imaging of ocular blood
flow, and optical coherence tomography are providing important
information regarding disease pathophysiology, diagnosis, progression,
and treatment. This article, on the role of UBM in the diagnosis and
management of angle-closure glaucoma, is the first in a series of
articles which will evaluate these new modalities.
Ultrasound biomicroscopy was developed by Dr. Charles Pavlin and
his colleagues in Toronto. The commercial version is produced by
Humphrey Instruments (Zeiss-Humphrey). High frequency transducers
permit improved resolution, approaching 50 microns in the living eye.
Scanning is performed with the patient in the supine position, using a
20 mm eye cup inserted between the lids to hold the methylcellulose or
normal saline coupling medium. The real-time video display is similar
to traditional B-scan ultrasonography.
Angle-closure glaucoma is an anatomic disorder comprising a final
common pathway of iris apposition to the trabecular meshwork resulting
from various abnormal relationships of anterior segment structures.
These in turn result from one or more abnormalities in the relative or
absolute sizes or positions of anterior segment structures or
posterior segment forces which alter anterior segment anatomy.
Prolonged appositional angle-closure leads to trabecular meshwork
dysfunction and peripheral anterior synechiae or acute angle-closure
glaucoma. The two most common anatomic causes of primary angle closure
are relative pupillary block and plateau iris.
Relative pupillary block is the most common cause of angle-closure
glaucoma and is responsible for more than 90% of cases. In pupillary
block, flow of aqueous from its site of production by the ciliary
epithelium in the posterior chamber to the anterior chamber is limited
because of resistance to aqueous flow through the pupil in the region
of iridolenticular contact. Since the iris is an otherwise flaccid
structure, it assumes an anteriorly bowed, or convex configuration in
response to this pressure gradient (Figure 1). Laser iridotomy
eliminates the pressure differential between the anterior and
posterior chambers and relieves the iris convexity. Following
iridotomy, the central iris is closely adherent to the anterior lens
capsule, while the peripheral iris assumes a flat configuration from
its point of departure from the lens capsule to its insertion into the
ciliary body (Figure 2).
In plateau iris, a large or anteriorly positioned pars plicata
supports the iris root in proximity to the trabecular meshwork,
forcing the peripheral iris into the angle (Figure 3). The anterior
chamber is usually of medium depth and the iris surface slightly
convex. On gonioscopy, the iris root angulates forward and then
centrally. With indentation gonioscopy, the ciliary processes prevent
posterior movement of the peripheral iris, resulting in a
configuration in which the slit beam follows the curvature of the iris
to its deepest point at the periphery of the lens where the ciliary
processes begin, then rises again over the ciliary processes before
dropping peripherally (S
sign). Greater force is needed to open the angle than in pupillary
block because the ciliary processes must be displaced, and the angle
does not open as widely. UBM provides a method for substantiating the
presence of continued appositional closure after iridotomy for
pupillary block or of occludability under conditions of physiologic
dilation in a darkened room.
The UBM provocative test and the need for dark-room gonioscopy
The key to successful management of the angle-closure glaucomas is
accurate diagnosis. Besides indentation gonioscopy, clinicians in the
past often relied upon a variety of provocative tests. Many of these,
including the prone dark-room and dilation provocative tests were
considered positive on the basis of a rise in IOP of 8 mmHg or more,
accompanied by gonioscopically confirmed angle-closure. However, most
gonioscopy was not done under darkroom conditions. At the present
time, provocative tests have largely fallen into disuse with the
universal advent of laser iridotomy. We have also only recently
discovered that a very large number of angles which are open under
light conditions are occludable in the dark.
Failure to diagnose angle-closure is often an important factor in
eyes with labile or poorly controlled IOP. When one is attempting to
determine whether or not a narrow angle is occludable, gonioscopy
should always be performed in a completely darkened room using the
smallest square of slit-lamp illumination possible which will enable a
view of the angle. The difference in the angle in light and dark
conditions may be much greater than expected and can be demonstrated
by UBM. UBM is also extremely useful for explaining the nature of the
disease and the rationale of treatment to patients who may be confused
between open-angle and angle-closure glaucomas and different types of
laser surgery.
An objective assessment of angle configuration can be accomplished
by comparing the UBM appearance of the angle under dark and light
conditions. Within minutes of dimming the examination room
illumination, the pupil dilates and bows anteriorly, narrowing the
angle and causing angle-closure in susceptible patients. he most
important anatomic landmark in the evaluation is the scleral spur,
which can be seen an the innermost point of the line separating the
ciliary body and the sclera. The trabecular meshwork is located
directly anterior to this structure. Because the scleral spur can be
easily visualized on UBM, the presence of iridotrabecular apposition
or significant angle narrowing is readily detectable.
[ About NYGRI ][ Education ][ Glaucoma Network ]
[ How You Can Help ][ Question Corner ][ Research ]
|