|
OPHTHALMOLOGY TIMES
THE GLAUCOMA ANGLE
COLUMN #29
ASSESSING FILTERING BLEBS
Introduction - Robert Ritch, MD
The filtering bleb is the desired outcome of and most important
feature of glaucoma filtration surgery. Nevertheless, for the most
part, ophthalmologists have performed trabeculectomy and then regarded
the formation or lack of formation of a successful bleb pretty much as
an act of God. The oft-repeated admonition among glaucomatologists,
that the surgery is only the beginning of the procedure, is finally
becoming translated from the realm of abstract thought into reality,
with the development of postoperative laser suture lysis and bleb
needling procedures. Still, surprisingly little work has been done to
characterize different types of blebs, to correlate types of blebs and
features of blebs with functionality, and to discover early
postoperative signs which will correlate with later bleb appearance
and function. The ultrasound biomicroscope offers a solution to many
of these problems, and an excellent start has been made by Dr. Tetsuya
Yamamoto and his colleagues in Gifu, Japan. Hopefully, their work will
stimulate others to investigate further in this important area.
Ultrasound biomicroscopy in evaluating filtering
bleb function
Tetsuya Yamamoto, MD
Associate Professor
and
Yoshiaki Kitazawa, MD, PhD
Professor and Chairman
Department of Ophthalmology, Gifu University
School of Medicine
Gifu Prefecture, Japan
The success of glaucoma filtering surgery depends solely upon
whether a well-functioning filtering bleb can be created. Kronfeld
classified filtering blebs into three main categories some 50 years
ago according to the appearance and function of the bleb. Kronfeld's
Type I bleb represents a polycystic, thin-walled bleb. The Type II
bleb represents a diffuse, perilimbally-extended bleb. Both types of
bleb function well in the majority of cases. Kronfeld's Type III bleb,
however, represents a flattened bleb with little or no function.
Later, a fourth type, the encapsulated bleb, which looks like a
well-demarcated conjunctival cyst and functions poorly, was
differentiated as an additional category.
These bleb classifications basically depend on decades-old
slit-lamp biomicroscopic findings. The recent development of
ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) by Pavlin and coworkers enables us to
visualize the anterior segment of the eye with microscopic precision,
which was previously impossible in the living eye. In addition, the
typical appearance of the filtering bleb has greatly changed since the
advent of the adjunctive use of antiproliferative agents to the
trabeculectomy procedure. Clinically, the filtering blebs in these
cases appear diffuse, avascular, thin-walled, and cystic.
We investigated the appearance of filtering blebs following
mitomycin-C trabeculectomy using UBM. The images were evaluated for
several features, including visibility of a route under the scleral
flap, reflectivity inside the bleb and formation of a cavernous
fluid-filled space inside the bleb. According to these ultrasound
characteristics (Table), we classified the blebs into four main
categories: Type L (low-reflective), Type H (high-reflective), Type E
(encapsulated), and Type F (flattened).
Our Type L bleb represents a well-functioning, succulent bleb,
which is defined by several characteristics of the intrableb
structure, including low-reflectivity and an outflow pathway
discernible under the scleral flap (Figure). In contrast, Type H, Type
E and Type F blebs correspond to less favorable surgical results. The
Type H bleb often appears to be a well-functioning bleb, with some
vascularity visible using a slit-lamp biomicroscope. Thus, it may be
difficult to distinguish the Type H bleb from the Type L bleb without
ultrasound biomicroscopy. The Type E bleb corresponds to an
encapsulated bleb. Although we can easily recognize a typical
encapsulated bleb by slit-lamp biomicroscopy, it is almost impossible
to distinguish a small, flat encapsulated bleb from a flattened bleb
by slit-lamp biomicroscopy. The UBM image of the Type F bleb is
characterized not only by the bleb flatness, but also by an
intensified reflectivity of the conjunctiva. In this way, the UBM
provides more clinically useful information on intrableb structure
than do conventional examination methods, including slit-lamp
biomicroscopy.
We recently investigated the relationship between bleb type and
associated clinical factors, and presented our data at the 1997 ARVO
meeting. Briefly, 67 consecutive eyes of 67 patients were analyzed.
All patients had a preoperative IOP ³20 mmHg, a mitomycin-C
trabeculectomy, and postoperative UBM imaging. A single researcher
classified the bleb typing based on UBM images for each patient in a
masked fashion. Type L bleb formation was analyzed by a logistic
multiple regression model and was correlated to several clinical
factors, such as type of glaucoma or age at surgery. The LOGIST
procedure of the PC-SAS statistical package was used for the analysis.
The regression model demonstrated that the type of glaucoma and past
history of intraocular surgeries correlated significantly with
formation of a Type L bleb, eyes with chronic open-angle glaucoma and
no previous surgery having the best chance of a well-functioning bleb
determined by UBM.
Practically speaking, UBM of filtering blebs in eyes in which IOP
breaks out of control provides useful information as to how to deal
with the situation. For example, when a scleral route under the
scleral flap is invisible in eyes with low intrableb reflectivity, a
needling procedure would be indicated to raise the flap. Reoperation
would be a better choice when the intrableb reflectivity is very high.
UBM imaging should be performed when a trabeculectomized eye suffers
from mild IOP elevation with a filtering bleb still discernible by
slit-lamp biomicroscopy.
Summarizing, the filtering bleb can be categorized into several
distinct types according to UBM images. The information on intrableb
structure obtained by UBM gives us a clue as to determining bleb
function and methods of managing it when the function begins to
decline. Future studies should refine this preliminary knowledge and
provide new insights.
Table
Main features of the bleb types
Type L Type H Type E Type F
Route under visible usually may be invisible
scleral flap visible visible
Intrableb low to high high intensified reflectivity
reflectivity medium in the conjunctiva
Formation of cavernous none
fluid-filled space
Bleb height moderate variable variable flat
to high
IOP control good fair poor poor
References
1. Kronfeld PC. The mechanism of filtering operations. Trans
pacific Coast Oto-Ophthalmol Soc 1949;30:23-40.
2. Yamamoto T, Sakuma T, Kitazawa Y. An ultrasound biomicroscopic
study of filtering blebs after mitomycin C trabeculectomy.
Ophthalmology 1995;102:1770-76.
3. Yamamoto T, Ichien K, Sawada A, et al. Clinical factors related
to a well-functioning filtering bleb. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
1997;38(Suppl):S165.
[ About NYGRI ][ Education ][ Glaucoma Network ]
[ How You Can Help ][ Question Corner ][ Research ]
|